Speaking in his Capitol Hill office, Huizenga argued that Congress should empower financial regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to regulate the market in compliance with the same rules governing other currencies and stocks.
The key challenge of regulation is agreeing on how digital currencies should be classified, Huizenga concluded, claiming that, “Everyone’s trying to figure out whether it’s fish or fowl. It turns out it might be a platypus. It’s kind of an unknown, or something sort of in between. How do we deal with that?”
The congressman echoed the sentiments of Coinbase’s Chief Legal and Risk Officer Mike Lempres who pointed out that financial regulators classify digital tokens within the obligations of their institution. While the SEC considers cryptocurrencies as securities, the CFTC argues that digital tokens are commodities. Other regulators, such as FinCEN and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), say that cryptocurrencies should be considered money and property, respectively.
Huizenga is a member of the Financial Services Committee and is Chairman of the Capital Markets, Securities, and Investment Subcommittee. According to Bloomberg, he could be a contender to lead the Financial Services Committee if the Republican party keeps control of the House of Representatives following the midterm elections.
Last month, U.S. Representative Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) stated that the ICO market requires “light touch” regulation to provide more clarity to investors while avoiding encumbering projects with undue regulations.
Earlier today, SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce issued an official dissent from the agency’s recent rejection of the appeal of Bats BZX Exchange, Inc. to list and trade shares of the Bitcoin (BTC) exchange-traded fund (ETF), the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust.